← Back to research

Poster · Western Institute of Nursing · 2026

Artificial intelligence in diabetes self-management: An integrative review

Le, M., Bilog, A. D., Long, S. N., Tonthat, J., Siatong, P., & Tolentino, D. A. (2026).

DiabetesArtificial intelligenceIntegrative review
Download the full poster (PDF)
The big idea

AI tools like chatbots and large language models could help people manage diabetes, but they are not yet safe or fair enough for everyone, and they need more careful, inclusive testing before everyday use.

Who
Patient-facing AI tools for diabetes self-management
How
Integrative review of 25 studies (PRISMA 2020)
What we learned
Promising results, but real gaps in safety and equity

In plain language

Can artificial intelligence safely help people manage diabetes? Our team reviewed 25 studies on patient-facing AI tools, such as chatbots and large language models, for diabetes self-management. These tools showed real promise for improving health and daily habits, but the review also found important gaps: some gave inaccurate or unsafe advice, and many were never tested with older adults, people with limited access to technology, or people who do not speak English. The bottom line is that AI tools need more careful, inclusive testing before they can be trusted for everyday diabetes care.

About this study

Following an established integrative review method (Whittemore and Knafl) and the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines, the team searched seven major databases spanning medicine, nursing, psychology, engineering, and computer science (including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library), plus grey literature to capture newer work not yet indexed.

Two reviewers independently screened and extracted each record, resolving disagreements through discussion. The 25 included studies were grouped into AI types (large language models, conversational agents, machine learning, and other approaches) and analyzed for effectiveness, safety, and equity.

Key themes

1

Real promise

AI tools showed benefits for clinical and behavioral diabetes outcomes across a range of approaches.

2

Safety gaps

Large language models sometimes produced misinformation or inappropriate advice, and machine-learning tools had reliability and validation concerns.

3

Equity gaps

Few tools were tested for language access, health literacy, or with older adults and people who have limited access to technology.

The poster

Conference poster: Artificial intelligence in diabetes self-management: An integrative review
Presented at the Western Institute of Nursing Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2026. Tap the poster to enlarge.